Posts Tagged ‘blood’

Micro-Hero of the Week: Vampire Edition!

October 26, 2009

Photobucket

Greetings, one and all, and welcome to the second of our very special theme weeks – Vampire Week! Brain-Cravers took center stage last week, but this week belongs to the Bloodsuckers!

As we are apt to do, we start out with a very special micro-hero from EG, and boy, is it a special one! See, over the weekend, EG was able to watch a special episode of Wolfman Mac’s Chiller Drive-In. Wolfman Mac is the latest in the fine history of Horror Hosts (such as Sir Graves Ghastly, The Ghoul, and Dr. Shock) that we’ve had in the area. This weekend’s movie? None other than that 1922 silent classic, Nosferatu!

Inspiration struck, and the Steve Austin Book Club is proud to present one of the most famous vampires of all time, Count Orlok!

Photobucket

Keep a lookout, because we’ve got a week of vampire goodness ahead!

Rollerball (1975) vs. Rollerball (2002)

May 30, 2008

Photobucket


By and large, I’m not a fan of remakes.  I know the goal is to try to capture lightning twice, to get an easy “win.”  All too often, a studio finds a perfectly good (often great) film, and proceeds to “update” it, making something that is, at best, pale imitation of the original, and, at worst, a two hour display of modern movie makers urinating on history.


Sure, there is the odd occasion when a remake is actually good, and the extremely rare case where it is as good as the original, and the almost non-existant instance in which the update is better than the original, but, by and large, remakes are bad.


I have long said, though, that if Hollywood wanted to really impress me, they shouldn’t try to remake great films, but, rather, lousy films.


That’s right – don’t give me a remake of Planet of the Apes; give me a remake of Batman and Robin, a film so bad that it made me want to gouge my own eyes out while sitting in the theater.


Anyway, time marches on, and, as is apt to happen, Hollywood is running out of “great” films to pillage, leaving lesser offerings.


Enter Rollerball.


Photobucket

Rollerball was a film released in 1975 starring James Caan and John Houseman. 

Photobucket

Set in the year 2018, the world is ruled by several Corporations that control everything.


Rollerball is the sport of the future, a game designed by the Executives of the Corporations, to show that the effort of the single individual is pointless.  It is played on a circular track, with ten players on each team – seven skaters and three motorcyclists. 


Photobucket

As the teams move around, a steel ball about the size of a softball is shot out, roulette style, around the top of the track. 


Photobucket

The teams try to take possession of the ball and deposit it into a goal.  Just that simple.


Photobucket

Oh, and it is pretty much a no-holds-barred free-for-all in stopping the opposing team from scoring.


Photobucket

The Executives face a problem, though.  In a sport in which no individual is supposed to rise above the others, one has – Jonathan E.


Photobucket

Jonathan E., played by James Caan, is the premiere Rollerball player in the world, a ten-year veteran of the sport.

Photobucket

The Executives decide that it is time for Jonathan E. to retire, and inform him.  Though resistance to the will of the Executives is unheard of, Jonathan finds that he cannot bring himself to retire.

Photobucket

What follows after that is a steady stream of pressure on Jonathan to obey the will of the Executives, while Jonathan comes to a place wanting more from himself than the futuristic gladiator that he has become.


The movie culminates in a final Rollerball match in which – well, I don’t want to spoil the whole thing.  Suffice it to say, the theme of the individual achievement versus sublimation to the rulers of society comes to a head.


Sound good?  Yeah, well, don’t get too excited.


Now, don’t get me wrong – the movie isn’t horrible.  It is too long and hasn’t aged as well as some other films, but Rollerball’s biggest crime is that it is pretty much just slightly better than mediocre. 


What manages to keep this movie above that line is the acting.  James Caan is good, though he seems to be trying to out melancholy Hamlet at times, and John Houseman, as the Energy Corporation Chairman, is very good.


Photobucket

(As he almost always is, even when he was on Silver Spoons.)


Photobucket

The theme of the film is a bit heavy handed, but handled well enough to inspire further thought on the matter even after the film is finished.


One thing is for certain:  Despite my idea of remaking bad films, I don’t think that anyone was really crying out for an update of the film, and yet…


Enter Rollerball, 2002.


Photobucket

Gone is that pesky futuristic world!  This film takes place in the here and now!  It is loud and in your face!  And it is eXtreme!  Yeah!


*sigh*


Okay, in this version, Rollerball is the big sport of the former Soviet republics.  It is essentially the same kinda sport, but now played on a figure eight track, and the point of the game is not to send a message to the people, but, rather, to get ratings. 

Photobucket

And to display singer Pink on large screens around the arena.


Photobucket

The star player of the sport is Jonathan Cross, played by Chris Klein. 


Photobucket

In this version, there are no Executives, but the sport is run by a crooked promoter played by Jean Reno.


Photobucket

Evil looking, ain’t he? Oh, yeah, and LL Cool J and Rebecca Romijn-Stamos were in the movie, too.


Photobucket Photobucket

So, Jonathan Cross discovers that players are being set-up to die to bring in ratings, and decides that is wrong!


Photobucket

He and LL Cool J attempt to escape across a border, which is about 20 minutes of your life you’ll never get back filmed entirely in glorious, grainy night vision.


Photobucket

Yeah.


Eventually Jonathan Cross is captured and forced to play.  Of course, he is now the next target to encourage increased ratings.

Photobucket

At this point, a film that was barely making any sense degrades into Jonathan Cross somehow starting a social revolution.


The end.


And, what did the re-makers manage to do with this film?


They took the heavy handed, yet still thought provoking theme of the original film of the individual achievement versus sublimation to the rulers of society and replaced it with an even heavier handed theme of greedily capitalizing on society’s bloodlust, a theme that requires no thought.


They replaced good actors (James Caan, John Houseman) with actors whose abilities remind one of cardboard.  Seriously, Chris Klein couldn’t inspire me to blow my nose, let alone revolt against the powers that be.


And, speaking of, the images of Chris Klein so far have been awfully fierce looking.  I mean, come on!  The Chris Klein we have come to know is that dopey looking Keanu Reeves kid.  Remember?


Photobucket

Where is that guy?  Oh, wait.  Found him!


Photobucket

Yep.  That’s the dopey guy we know.


Now, back to Rollerball.


Thankfully, the 2002 version is much shorter than the original.  Unfortunately, it feels twice as long when you are watching.


So, while the original film isn’t the greatest, it is a masterpiece compared to the updated version.


On a closing note, the basis of these films was a short story called Roller Ball Murder.  Aside from the ridiculous name of the sport (yeah, “Roller Ball Murder” is the name), it is actually quite good – a first person narrative from the viewpoint of Jonathan E., very much the story of a weary, futuristic gladiator.  If you have about a half hour, you can listen to the whole thing, courtesy of radio show from the ’70’s, MindWebs, the episodes of which have been archived in MP3 form on the internet!